Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Poll Question for "If Computers are finally as Strong as GM's"

Author: Harald Faber

Date: 08:03:14 06/24/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 24, 1999 at 09:42:56, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>>>>>>A reason why you don't count Hiarcs-Hergott?
>>>>>
>>>>>yes... games were not 40/2, games were held in a mall.  Hergott is a weaker
>>>>>IM.  It was so noisy he had to wear headphones..
>>>>>etc...
>>>>
>>>>1) IM is IM; who gives the right and is able to judge WEAK or STRONG? Even a
>>>>WEAK IM is still an IM.
>>>>2) Hiarcs WON. Although it was only 6 games. But 6 games plus 6 games
>>>>plus...plus... someday make a bunch.
>>>>3) I guess it was Fischer who said: "the only ones with no excuses when they
>>>>lose against me are computers."
>>>
>>>
>>>Doesn't matter.  You don't earn a GM norm playing an IM in a match.  So trying
>>>to answer the question "are computers at GM level?" is not going to be answered
>>>by playing an IM in a noisy mall at non-40/2 time controls...
>>
>>You try to miss the point, don't you? ;-)
>>If you win an IM clearly, then you are certainly ABOVE. Right? And what is above
>>IM? Is there something between IM and GM? I don't know of anything.
>>I was not talking of EARNING a NORM.
>>I was talking of GM LEVEL.
>
>
>No you don't.  If you beat an IM, you are probably an IM.  But you aren't a
>GM until you can play with GMs...  And using the Hergott match doesn't mean
>much.  What GM would play chess where he has to wear headphones to drown out
>the noise?

I suppose Hergott knew the conditions.

>And the games were _not_ 40/2hr, which is the time control we are
>discussing?

Anyone remember the time control EXACTLY before we continue guessing?

>>>And hiarcs did
>>>win... but aren't we discussing 40/2hr time controls here?  The hiarcs/Hergott
>>>match was not 40/2.  So it all seems totally unrelated to the question being
>>>asked...
>>
>>What was the time control then? AFAIR it was 40/120 or VERY VERY CLOSE.
>
>
>I think it was something like 40/60, then game/30.

AFAIR it was MUCH slower. But my memory fails from time to time. :-)




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.