Author: Sarah Bird
Date: 09:31:53 06/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 1999 at 12:24:26, Mark Young wrote:
>P II 450
>
>128mb Hash
>
>
>90'/60+90'/60+0'0/ 1999
>
> 123456789
>1 Hiarcs 7.32 ½0½110011 5.0/9
>2 Junior 5.0 ½1½001100 4.0/9
>
>
>[Event "90'/60+90'/60+0'0/"]
>[Site "?"]
>[Date "1999.06.25"]
>[Round "8"]
>[White "Junior 5.0"]
>[Black "Hiarcs 7.32"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "A46"]
>[PlyCount "144"]
>
>{W=20.8 ply, B=6.6ply} 1. d4 {0} 1... d6 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... Nf6 {0} 3. Nc3 {0}
>3... Bf5 {0} 4. Bg5 {0} 4... Nbd7 {0} 5. Nh4 {0} 5... Bg6 {0} 6. Nxg6 {0} 6...
>hxg6 {0} 7. e4 {0} 7... c6 {Both last book move 0} 8. Qd2 {0.21/15 130} 8... e6
>{0.56/9 94} 9. Be2 {0.25/15 106} 9... Be7 {0.56/10 142} 10. h4 {
>(0-0-0) 0.30/15 108} 10... b5 {0.39/9 138} 11. a3 {0.16/15 134} 11... a5 {
>0.34/9 119} 12. f3 {(Bf3) 0.04/14 97} 12... Nh5 {0.26/9 131} 13. Rh3 {
>0.13/14 69} 13... O-O {(Nhf6) 0.24/9 123} 14. Bxe7 {(g4) 0.20/15 130} 14...
>Qxe7 {-0.06/8 31} 15. g4 {(0-0-0) 0.28/16 125} 15... Nhf6 {0.34/11 209} 16. h5
>{0.48/16 103} 16... gxh5 {0.47/10 163} 17. gxh5 {0.47/15 98} 17... e5 {
>(b4) 0.56/10 149} 18. h6 {0.52/15 80} 18... g6 {0.35/9 97} 19. O-O-O {
>(dxe5) 0.40/14 108} 19... b4 {0.23/9 82} 20. Nb1 {0.14/14 136} 20... exd4 {
>0.13/9 105} 21. Qxd4 {0.06/14 289} 21... d5 {0.13/9 103} 22. h7+ {
>(Bd3) 0.14/13 109} 22... Kh8 {-0.08/9 100} 23. Bd3 {(Rdh1) -0.01/13 78} 23...
>c5 {(Qc5) -0.24/8 127} 24. Qe3 {(Qf2) 0.00/14 185} 24... c4 {-0.40/8 67} 25.
>Bf1 {(Be2) -0.29/14 137} 25... c3 {-0.56/8 92} 26. Qd4 {(b3) -0.35/14 166}
>26... dxe4 {-0.57/8 134} 27. axb4 {-0.61/14 246} 27... cxb2+ {(e3) -0.57/8 88}
>28. Qxb2 {-0.47/14 53} 28... Qxb4 {-0.66/9 88} 29. Qa1 {(Qxb4) -0.61/15 123}
>29... Rfd8 {-1.13/8 89} 30. Nd2 {(Be2) -0.59/14 76} 30... exf3 {-0.61/8 421}
>31. Bc4 {(Rxf3) -0.63/14 124} 31... f2 {(Rac8) -1.19/8 206} 32. Rf3 {
>(Bxf7) -0.79/13 187} 32... Kxh7 {(Qe7) -1.40/8 119} 33. Bxf7 {
>(Rxf2) -0.71/12 86} 33... Kg7 {(Rac8) -1.83/8 195} 34. Bd5 {-0.73/13 194} 34...
>Rab8 {-1.63/8 117} 35. Rxf2 {(Rf1) -0.92/12 128} 35... Ne5 {-1.56/8 114} 36.
>Nb3 {(Nc4) -0.95/11 59} 36... Neg4 {-2.72/8 136} 37. Rff1 {(Rf3) -1.12/13 82}
>37... Qb6 {(a4) -2.74/8 63} 38. Rd3 {(Bh1) -2.07/13 160} 38... Ne3 {-2.72/8 72}
>39. Rxf6 {-2.12/14 102} 39... Qxf6 {-2.69/8 48} 40. Qxa5 {-2.12/13 65} 40...
>Nxd5 {-2.69/8 64} 41. Rxd5 {-2.18/11 32} 41... Rxd5 {-2.76/8 65} 42. Qxd5 {
>-2.21/13 106} 42... Re8 {(g5) -2.76/8 65} 43. Nd4 {-2.13/13 99} 43... Qe5 {
>(g5) -2.79/7 42} 44. Qxe5+ {(Qb7+) -1.95/14 148} 44... Rxe5 {-3.09/10 27} 45.
>Kd2 {-2.14/20 59} 45... g5 {(Kf6) -3.09/11 69} 46. Nf3 {(Ne2) -2.18/19 125}
>46... Ra5 {(Rd5+) -3.19/10 58} 47. Nd4 {(Nh2) -2.13/18 47} 47... Kf6 {
>(Ra4) -3.33/11 70} 48. c3 {-2.24/19 88} 48... g4 {(Ra3) -3.45/11 71} 49. Ke3 {
>-2.54/19 52} 49... Ra3 {(Kg5) -3.53/11 71} 50. Ne2 {-2.56/20 38} 50... Kg5 {
>-3.72/11 71} 51. Ke4 {(Kd3) -3.04/20 46} 51... Kh4 {(Ra2) -4.03/11 72} 52. c4 {
>(Ke3) -3.62/19 69} 52... g3 {-5.44/10 69} 53. Nxg3 {(c5) -3.51/20 58} 53...
>Rxg3 {-#21/1 0} 54. c5 {-4.36/23 42} 54... Kg5 {-#20/1 0} 55. Ke5 {-5.92/25 47}
>55... Re3+ {(Rc3) -#19/1 0} 56. Kd4 {-5.28/24 45} 56... Re1 {(Re6) -#18/1 0}
>57. Kd5 {-6.06/25 70} 57... Kf6 {-#17/1 0} 58. c6 {-6.09/22 32} 58... Rd1+ {
>-#16/1 0} 59. Ke4 {-6.10/24 38} 59... Ke6 {-#15/1 0} 60. c7 {-6.10/23 54} 60...
>Rc1 {-#14/1 0} 61. Kd4 {-6.21/25 80} 61... Rxc7 {-#13/1 0} 62. Ke4 {-6.87/29 81
>} 62... Rd7 {(Rc4+) -#12/1 0} 63. Kf3 {-#7/35 78} 63... Ke5 {(Kf5) -#10/1 0}
>64. Ke3 {-#7/35 76} 64... Kf5 {-#9/1 0} 65. Kf2 {-#6/53 73} 65... Re7 {
>(Kf4) -#8/1 0} 66. Kf3 {-#6/61 64} 66... Kg5 {(Re5) -#7/1 0} 67. Kg3 {-#6/61 75
>} 67... Rf7 {-#6/1 0} 68. Kh2 {-#5/61 40} 68... Kg4 {-#5/1 0} 69. Kg2 {-#4/63 2
>} 69... Rf8 {(Rf3) -#4/1 0} 70. Kh1 {-#4/63 3} 70... Rf2 {-#3/1 0} 71. Kg1 {
>-6.23/3 0} 71... Kg3 {-#2/1 0} 72. Kh1 {-#2/3 0} 72... Rf1# {-#1/1 0} 0-1
Mark, Please excuse my ignorance but on the above game the third of the four
games you posted. The ply counts posted as W=20.8 ply, B=6.6ply is this average
ply count for the game. While I realize that a lot of it was likely generated by
the endgame is to me is amazing that Hiarcs can win when the ply count is so so
much lower.
Thanks.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.