Author: Mark Young
Date: 09:45:06 06/25/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 25, 1999 at 12:31:53, Sarah Bird wrote:
>On June 25, 1999 at 12:24:26, Mark Young wrote:
>
>>P II 450
>>
>>128mb Hash
>>
>>
>>90'/60+90'/60+0'0/ 1999
>>
>> 123456789
>>1 Hiarcs 7.32 ½0½110011 5.0/9
>>2 Junior 5.0 ½1½001100 4.0/9
>>
>>
>>[Event "90'/60+90'/60+0'0/"]
>>[Site "?"]
>>[Date "1999.06.25"]
>>[Round "8"]
>>[White "Junior 5.0"]
>>[Black "Hiarcs 7.32"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "A46"]
>>[PlyCount "144"]
>>
>>{W=20.8 ply, B=6.6ply} 1. d4 {0} 1... d6 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... Nf6 {0} 3. Nc3 {0}
>>3... Bf5 {0} 4. Bg5 {0} 4... Nbd7 {0} 5. Nh4 {0} 5... Bg6 {0} 6. Nxg6 {0} 6...
>>hxg6 {0} 7. e4 {0} 7... c6 {Both last book move 0} 8. Qd2 {0.21/15 130} 8... e6
>>{0.56/9 94} 9. Be2 {0.25/15 106} 9... Be7 {0.56/10 142} 10. h4 {
>>(0-0-0) 0.30/15 108} 10... b5 {0.39/9 138} 11. a3 {0.16/15 134} 11... a5 {
>>0.34/9 119} 12. f3 {(Bf3) 0.04/14 97} 12... Nh5 {0.26/9 131} 13. Rh3 {
>>0.13/14 69} 13... O-O {(Nhf6) 0.24/9 123} 14. Bxe7 {(g4) 0.20/15 130} 14...
>>Qxe7 {-0.06/8 31} 15. g4 {(0-0-0) 0.28/16 125} 15... Nhf6 {0.34/11 209} 16. h5
>>{0.48/16 103} 16... gxh5 {0.47/10 163} 17. gxh5 {0.47/15 98} 17... e5 {
>>(b4) 0.56/10 149} 18. h6 {0.52/15 80} 18... g6 {0.35/9 97} 19. O-O-O {
>>(dxe5) 0.40/14 108} 19... b4 {0.23/9 82} 20. Nb1 {0.14/14 136} 20... exd4 {
>>0.13/9 105} 21. Qxd4 {0.06/14 289} 21... d5 {0.13/9 103} 22. h7+ {
>>(Bd3) 0.14/13 109} 22... Kh8 {-0.08/9 100} 23. Bd3 {(Rdh1) -0.01/13 78} 23...
>>c5 {(Qc5) -0.24/8 127} 24. Qe3 {(Qf2) 0.00/14 185} 24... c4 {-0.40/8 67} 25.
>>Bf1 {(Be2) -0.29/14 137} 25... c3 {-0.56/8 92} 26. Qd4 {(b3) -0.35/14 166}
>>26... dxe4 {-0.57/8 134} 27. axb4 {-0.61/14 246} 27... cxb2+ {(e3) -0.57/8 88}
>>28. Qxb2 {-0.47/14 53} 28... Qxb4 {-0.66/9 88} 29. Qa1 {(Qxb4) -0.61/15 123}
>>29... Rfd8 {-1.13/8 89} 30. Nd2 {(Be2) -0.59/14 76} 30... exf3 {-0.61/8 421}
>>31. Bc4 {(Rxf3) -0.63/14 124} 31... f2 {(Rac8) -1.19/8 206} 32. Rf3 {
>>(Bxf7) -0.79/13 187} 32... Kxh7 {(Qe7) -1.40/8 119} 33. Bxf7 {
>>(Rxf2) -0.71/12 86} 33... Kg7 {(Rac8) -1.83/8 195} 34. Bd5 {-0.73/13 194} 34...
>>Rab8 {-1.63/8 117} 35. Rxf2 {(Rf1) -0.92/12 128} 35... Ne5 {-1.56/8 114} 36.
>>Nb3 {(Nc4) -0.95/11 59} 36... Neg4 {-2.72/8 136} 37. Rff1 {(Rf3) -1.12/13 82}
>>37... Qb6 {(a4) -2.74/8 63} 38. Rd3 {(Bh1) -2.07/13 160} 38... Ne3 {-2.72/8 72}
>>39. Rxf6 {-2.12/14 102} 39... Qxf6 {-2.69/8 48} 40. Qxa5 {-2.12/13 65} 40...
>>Nxd5 {-2.69/8 64} 41. Rxd5 {-2.18/11 32} 41... Rxd5 {-2.76/8 65} 42. Qxd5 {
>>-2.21/13 106} 42... Re8 {(g5) -2.76/8 65} 43. Nd4 {-2.13/13 99} 43... Qe5 {
>>(g5) -2.79/7 42} 44. Qxe5+ {(Qb7+) -1.95/14 148} 44... Rxe5 {-3.09/10 27} 45.
>>Kd2 {-2.14/20 59} 45... g5 {(Kf6) -3.09/11 69} 46. Nf3 {(Ne2) -2.18/19 125}
>>46... Ra5 {(Rd5+) -3.19/10 58} 47. Nd4 {(Nh2) -2.13/18 47} 47... Kf6 {
>>(Ra4) -3.33/11 70} 48. c3 {-2.24/19 88} 48... g4 {(Ra3) -3.45/11 71} 49. Ke3 {
>>-2.54/19 52} 49... Ra3 {(Kg5) -3.53/11 71} 50. Ne2 {-2.56/20 38} 50... Kg5 {
>>-3.72/11 71} 51. Ke4 {(Kd3) -3.04/20 46} 51... Kh4 {(Ra2) -4.03/11 72} 52. c4 {
>>(Ke3) -3.62/19 69} 52... g3 {-5.44/10 69} 53. Nxg3 {(c5) -3.51/20 58} 53...
>>Rxg3 {-#21/1 0} 54. c5 {-4.36/23 42} 54... Kg5 {-#20/1 0} 55. Ke5 {-5.92/25 47}
>>55... Re3+ {(Rc3) -#19/1 0} 56. Kd4 {-5.28/24 45} 56... Re1 {(Re6) -#18/1 0}
>>57. Kd5 {-6.06/25 70} 57... Kf6 {-#17/1 0} 58. c6 {-6.09/22 32} 58... Rd1+ {
>>-#16/1 0} 59. Ke4 {-6.10/24 38} 59... Ke6 {-#15/1 0} 60. c7 {-6.10/23 54} 60...
>>Rc1 {-#14/1 0} 61. Kd4 {-6.21/25 80} 61... Rxc7 {-#13/1 0} 62. Ke4 {-6.87/29 81
>>} 62... Rd7 {(Rc4+) -#12/1 0} 63. Kf3 {-#7/35 78} 63... Ke5 {(Kf5) -#10/1 0}
>>64. Ke3 {-#7/35 76} 64... Kf5 {-#9/1 0} 65. Kf2 {-#6/53 73} 65... Re7 {
>>(Kf4) -#8/1 0} 66. Kf3 {-#6/61 64} 66... Kg5 {(Re5) -#7/1 0} 67. Kg3 {-#6/61 75
>>} 67... Rf7 {-#6/1 0} 68. Kh2 {-#5/61 40} 68... Kg4 {-#5/1 0} 69. Kg2 {-#4/63 2
>>} 69... Rf8 {(Rf3) -#4/1 0} 70. Kh1 {-#4/63 3} 70... Rf2 {-#3/1 0} 71. Kg1 {
>>-6.23/3 0} 71... Kg3 {-#2/1 0} 72. Kh1 {-#2/3 0} 72... Rf1# {-#1/1 0} 0-1
>
>Mark, Please excuse my ignorance but on the above game the third of the four
>games you posted. The ply counts posted as W=20.8 ply, B=6.6ply is this average
>ply count for the game. While I realize that a lot of it was likely generated by
>the endgame is to me is amazing that Hiarcs can win when the ply count is so so
>much lower.
>Thanks.
>Sarah.
This "W=20.8 ply, B=6.6ply" is very misleading. Hiarcs7.32 has tablebases. And
when It see a long mate, like in this game it averages all the tablebase moves
as 0 plys. At the sometime Junior is in an engame and seeing over 20 plys and
adding it to its ply average.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.