Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fictitious Harvard Cup 1999

Author: Roger D Davis

Date: 11:21:35 06/25/99

Go up one level in this thread


I think that Kamsky's father would seek to prevent him from participating in an
imaginary event. ;)

Roger


On June 25, 1999 at 13:09:04, Lawrence S. Tamarkin wrote:

>I thought a fictitious Harvard Cup would involve picking which humans &
>computer's would be in it, basing it on the setup that was traditionally used in
>past Harvard cup events.
>
>My picks would be,
>
>Human's:                             Playing programs:
>
>1. Benjamin                          1.Shredder (of course)
>
>2. Rohde                             2.Fritz5
>
>3. Christiansen                      3.Hiarcs7.32
>
>4. Yermolinsky                       4.Nimzo99 (or 2000)
>
>5. Fedorowicz                        5.CM6000 (of of course)
>
>6. Gulko                             6.CS Tal II for Windows (A real wild card)
>
>I might have suggested Kamsky as a good choice among humans, but we don't know
>if he will ever play again or would hypothetically be available (even in an
>immagined event!), here.  Also Seirawan would be a good choice, but he has never
>played in the Harvord cups in the past. (Probably has lot to do with his
>schedule & placement on the west coast).
>
>The playing programs are the most notible ones (Did I forget any that are
>killer's?), available at the moment, so this would be a dream event.  If only
>they still set these things up.  Was it because they felt the programs were
>finally going to win that it was discontinued?
>
>mrslug - the chess software addict!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On June 25, 1999 at 11:50:16, James Robertson wrote:
>
>>On June 25, 1999 at 08:08:20, Leon Stancliff wrote:
>>
>>>The top ten humans in the U.S.A. average 2595 on the Fide scale.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The top ten micro programs average 2550 on the Hallsworth Selective Search scale
>>>when operating at 200 mhz. We would expect at least a 50 point increase when
>>>operating at 400 mhz. Therefore, the micros would average 2600.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>There would be a five point advantage for the micros, but not enough to show if
>>>each of the humans play one black and one white with each of the micros. I
>>>predict the match would be dead even.
>>>
>>
>>Invite Odell's 2264 master friend. He'd teach those computers a lesson.
>>
>>James
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>G. Kasparov has stated that the top micros are playing above 2600 now.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.