Author: Jerry Creed
Date: 19:43:09 06/25/99
Let me start. After re-reading Komputer Korners explanation of violations of the opposite priority rule leading to eradication of =/ and /= Informant signs and the non-capturing all of the numerics phenomenon when importing EPD files, backsolving seemed even less usable than ever, unless I wanted to not use it and do all evaluations manually. However, this dilemma is clearly neutralized when re-reading Mike Leahy's Backsolving de-mystified. So, I ask you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, can backsolving be trusted if left on to Always Solve, should favor unclear over equality be checked or unchecked and would you allow backsolving to work on Informant symbols or just plain numerical, as from Zarkov? That seems to be the question. http://www.icdchess.com/wccr/index.html to find Komputer Korners' report : Bookup 1.5.2: A Continuing Review by Komputer Korner on Wed May 12 11:53:24 1999 http://www.bookup.com/ Home of Bookup
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.