Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs7.32 holds Slim Lead Over Junior 5 After 9 Games. 90'/60

Author: Mark Young

Date: 22:30:58 06/25/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 26, 1999 at 00:45:31, Terry Ripple wrote:

>Hi Mark,
>   Is this correct to state that you are using 128MB Hash for both? I read on
>here that 64MB Hash is plenty for Hiarcs at 40/2hr., so can this slow the
>program down somewhat if you use too much on a shorter time control? Sources say
>that too big of Hash affects the time on the clock to possibly creating time
>pressure! I don`t know the answers but i`am just trying to get information by
>presenting questions in hoping someone on this forum will know. I like your
>matches and wanted to let you know how much i appreciate what your doing!
>
>Best to you,
>Terry Ripple

I ran tests on Hiarcs to see if 128mb hash would hurt Hiarcs 7.32. I found
nothing to show it hurt Hiarcs 7.32 in using this amount for slow games, so I
used it. Does it help for Hiarcs7.32 or Junior to use this amount of hash, I
doubt it, but it will help Fritz 5. When I test Fritz 5 I will give Fritz all
the ram it wants and plain to use 256mb the max for Fritz 5, I will keep Hiarcs
at 128.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.