Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: mcp8 vs. humans, additional question

Author: Marc Plum

Date: 08:50:16 06/26/99

Go up one level in this thread


My experience is with the previous version, MCP7, which oddly enough has been
placing higher on the SSDF lists than version 8.  Yes, like most top programs it
is very hard for most people to beat.  I recently had to reinstall it when some
files on my computer were accidentally erased.  Since then, my record is +2 -8
=2.  My previous record was probably in the same proportions, but over perhaps a
hundred or so games.

One thing about version 7 which I hope has been corrected in MCP8.  I always try
to set a program so that it won't show me its thinking when I am playing it.
With MCP7, though, even when you turn "Watch Thinking" off, it still shows some
analysis.  I have to be careful not to glance at the bottom of the screen!

To return to your original point, of course very few people who post here will
have winning records against any of the top commercial programs, or the best
freeware.  Speaking for myself, the only current programs I have winning records
against are probably ZChess, Chenard, and possibly Arasan.  Maybe also ExChess,
but I'm not sure, and I don't have complete records.  But I spend much more time
playing programs like Crafty, Hiarcs 7.01, Rebel10, Fritz, etc., which can be
relied upon to score, I don't know, 80%?, 90%,? 95%?  It's more fun when I get
one of my rare wins.  :-)

Marc

On June 25, 1999 at 23:38:00, marvin bolden wrote:

>everyone keeps ragging on mcp8 about how it plays against other programs but
>let's comments about how it plays against people.  all you people who play
>engine vs engine, why don't you play against each engine an d report how they
>perform.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.