Author: Chris Taylor
Date: 12:04:12 06/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 1999 at 10:31:55, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>On June 26, 1999 at 08:29:58, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>>I have used Compare engine notation in Fritz 532 to analise the game. So, below
>>is the fruits off a 30 sec/move, on a AMD 400. Programs used are Hiarcs6 And
>>Hiarcs732
>>
>>This may give some idea of how play might have gone if only?........
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>[Event "Match game\60 game2"]
>>[Site "chess club"]
>>[Date "1999.06.25"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Richard uscf2265"]
>>[Black "Hiarcs6 Cyrix233 16m"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "B23"]
>>[WhiteElo "2265"]
>>[BlackElo "2520"]
>>[PlyCount "37"]
>>[EventDate "1999.??.??"]
>>
>>1. e4 c5 2. Nc3 d6 3. f4 Nc6 4. Nf3 g6 5. Bc4 Bg7 6. O-O Nf6 7. d3 O-O 8. Qe1
>>a6 {last book move. last book move} 9. a4 Bd7 ({Hiarcs 6.0: (461385N)} 9... Bd7
>>10. Bd2 Nh5 11. Qb1 Qb6 12. Qa2 {0.17/7}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (857189N)} 9... Bd7
>>10. Bd2 Nh5 11. f5 gxf5 12. Qh4 Nf6 13. Ng5 fxe4 14. Ncxe4 {0.00/8}) 10. Qh4
>>Nb4 ({Hiarcs 6.0: (766567N)} 10... Nb4 11. Bb3 Be6 12. Bxe6 Nxc2 13. Bxf7+ Rxf7
>>14. Rb1 Nb4 15. d4 {-0.14/8}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (1128379N)} 10... Nb4 11. Rf2 Ng4
>>12. Re2 Bf6 13. Qg3 Qa5 14. h3 Nh6 {-0.12/8}) 11. f5 gxf5 ({
>>Hiarcs 6.0: (1612436N)} 11... gxf5 12. Rf2 b5 13. Bb3 bxa4 14. Bxa4 fxe4 15.
>>Nxe4 Ng4 16. Re2 {-0.78/8}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (2340790N)} 11... gxf5 12. Bh6 Nxc2
>>{-0.63/8}) 12. Bh6 Nxc2 ({Hiarcs 6.0: (1429805N)} 12... Nxc2 13. Rac1 Nb4 14.
>>Bxg7 Kxg7 15. e5 Ng4 16. h3 Nxe5 17. Nxe5 dxe5 18. Qg3+ Kf6 {-0.77/7}) ({
>>Hiarcs 7.32: (969326N)} 12... Nxc2 13. Rac1 Nb4 {-0.63/7}) 13. Rac1 Bxh6 ({
>>Hiarcs 6.0: (756147N)} 13... Bxh6 14. Qxh6 Nb4 15. e5 Ng4 16. Qg5+ Kh8 17. Qh5
>>h6 18. exd6 exd6 {-0.78/7}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (876293N)} 13... Nb4 14. Qg5 Ne8 15.
>>exf5 Bxf5 16. Qxf5 Bxh6 {-0.63/7}) 14. Qxh6 Nb4 ({Hiarcs 6.0: (1106186N)} 14...
>>Nb4 15. Ng5 e5 16. g3 Qe7 17. exf5 {-0.79/7}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (4533065N)} 14...
>>Nd4 15. Ng5 Be6 16. e5 {0.02/9}) 15. Ng5 e5 ({Hiarcs 6.0: (3292930N)} 15... e5
>>16. exf5 d5 17. Bxd5 Bc8 18. a5 Nbxd5 19. Nxd5 Qxd5 20. Qxf6 {0.71/7}) ({
>>Hiarcs 7.32: (3979343N)} 15... Qe8 16. Rf4 b5 17. Nxh7 Ng4 18. Qxf8+ Qxf8 19.
>>Nxf8 Rxf8 20. exf5 bxc4 21. Rxg4+ Kh8 22. dxc4 Bxf5 {2.17/7}) 16. exf5 d5 ({
>>Hiarcs 6.0: (1601236N)} 16... d5 17. Nxh7 Nxh7 18. f6 Nxf6 19. Qg5+ Kh7 20.
>>Rxf6 Qxf6 21. Qxf6 dxc4 22. dxc4 {2.53/8}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (4588573N)} 16... Bc6
>>17. Nxh7 Ng4 18. Qg6+ Kh8 19. Qh5 d5 20. Nxf8+ Kg8 21. Qxg4+ Kxf8 {5.43/8}) 17.
>>Bxd5 c4 ({Hiarcs 6.0: (4314277N)} 17... c4 18. Nxh7 Ng4 19. Qxf8+ Qxf8 20. Nxf8
>>Rxf8 21. dxc4 Ne3 22. Rf3 Nbxd5 23. Rg3+ Kh8 24. cxd5 Nxf5 {4.36/8}) ({
>>Hiarcs 7.32: (3565208N)} 17... Kh8 18. Bxb7 Nxd3 19. Nxh7 Nxh7 20. f6 Rg8 21.
>>Be4 Rxg2+ 22. Kxg2 Qg8+ 23. Qg7+ {5.56/8}) 18. dxc4 Qb6+ ({
>>Hiarcs 6.0: (2671382N)} 18... Bxa4 19. Nxh7 {5.27/7}) ({Hiarcs 7.32: (3463166N)
>>} 18... Kh8 19. Nce4 Nbxd5 20. cxd5 Qb6+ 21. Kh1 Bxf5 22. Rxf5 Qxb2 23. Qxf6+
>>Kg8 {9.42/8}) 19. Kh1 1-0
>
>
>
>_NONE_ of this is any good. It misses the point that the human _understands_
>a long-term attack while the computer does not. So why bother having a computer
>try to carry out the human-side of such a game? IE if the human blows Hiarcs
>6 up, who says that a computer can play the human side and still do that?
Sorry Bob, I do not understand what you mean? This was just to see what Hiarcs
6 and Hiarcs 7/32 did that might be different, from the Dos version. I haave no
desire to waste any time, but since I was out at the shops, the silicon monster
did a bit on number crunching, thats all?
I am not a very good chess player, so this is the only link to a better
player than I will ever be???????????????????????????
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.