Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 01:26:05 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 26, 1999 at 20:47:27, James Robertson wrote:
>On June 26, 1999 at 17:58:30, Terry Ripple wrote:
>
>>On June 26, 1999 at 17:13:04, James Robertson wrote:
>>
>>>On June 26, 1999 at 17:06:28, Terry Ripple wrote:
>>>
>>>>I agree Mark, you said it all in a nut shell! If you checked out my last two
>>>>posts to his last two games where i let Hiarcs7.32 play the same games at the
>>>>same time in the critical positions,Hiarcs would not have made those weak moves!
>>>>Plus Hiarcs6 and Hiarcs7.32 don`t even agree to some of the early moves in the
>>>>Opening stages!!
>>>>--------
>>>>Terry
>>>
>>>My program doesn't make some of the weak moves and doesn't agree on most of the
>>>early moves in the opening stages. What's your point?
>>>
>>>James
>>---------
>>The point, James
>> Some observers on this forum are comparing these two loses against the low
>>rated master as why Chess programs are not High Rated Masters because they would
>>not have made those silly errors and as the result a loss. Don`t compare Hiarcs6
>>loss to the other high rated programs as though these would also perform as
>>poorly and also don`t deserve to be known as high rated Masters. The moves i
>>posted from Hiarcs7.32 in the 2 games, shows it would have performed better and
>>probaly beat the the rated master!
>
>Well.... that is like saying that if Sokolov had not played 11. Bc5 at the WCCC
>he probably would have beaten Fritz.
>
>> My friend is a 2345 USCF Master and played more than 2 dozen games at time
>>controls of game/60min., game/45min. and games/30 against Chessmaster6000 in my
>>home and his results to show are Only 1 win!!! Top Programs are Grandmasters!
>
>That still proves nothing; he may be extremely inept at playing computers, USCF
>ratings are >100 points higher than FIDE ratings, and who knows what the
>circumstances were at your house. Could be anything from a construction crew
>building a skyscraper next door to him chatting and relaxing with you. :)
>
>James
>
>>Thats my Point!
>>Best regards.
>>Terry
-----------
Hardly James,
He took these games Very seriously because he knew that the games were
going to be distributed to the members of our club and he doesnt like to lose to
anyone or anything! You know thats the criteria for a good player!
He was Pennsylvania State Champion the past 3 years in a row and there
were some higher ratings than his that he needed to Beat!!!
--------
Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.