Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 02:23:50 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 04:26:05, Terry Ripple wrote: >On June 26, 1999 at 20:47:27, James Robertson wrote: > >>On June 26, 1999 at 17:58:30, Terry Ripple wrote: >> >>>On June 26, 1999 at 17:13:04, James Robertson wrote: >>> >>>>On June 26, 1999 at 17:06:28, Terry Ripple wrote: >>>> >>>>>I agree Mark, you said it all in a nut shell! If you checked out my last two >>>>>posts to his last two games where i let Hiarcs7.32 play the same games at the >>>>>same time in the critical positions,Hiarcs would not have made those weak moves! >>>>>Plus Hiarcs6 and Hiarcs7.32 don`t even agree to some of the early moves in the >>>>>Opening stages!! >>>>>-------- >>>>>Terry >>>> >>>>My program doesn't make some of the weak moves and doesn't agree on most of the >>>>early moves in the opening stages. What's your point? >>>> >>>>James >>>--------- >>>The point, James >>> Some observers on this forum are comparing these two loses against the low >>>rated master as why Chess programs are not High Rated Masters because they would >>>not have made those silly errors and as the result a loss. Don`t compare Hiarcs6 >>>loss to the other high rated programs as though these would also perform as >>>poorly and also don`t deserve to be known as high rated Masters. The moves i >>>posted from Hiarcs7.32 in the 2 games, shows it would have performed better and >>>probaly beat the the rated master! >> >>Well.... that is like saying that if Sokolov had not played 11. Bc5 at the WCCC >>he probably would have beaten Fritz. >> >>> My friend is a 2345 USCF Master and played more than 2 dozen games at time >>>controls of game/60min., game/45min. and games/30 against Chessmaster6000 in my >>>home and his results to show are Only 1 win!!! Top Programs are Grandmasters! >> >>That still proves nothing; he may be extremely inept at playing computers, USCF >>ratings are >100 points higher than FIDE ratings, and who knows what the >>circumstances were at your house. Could be anything from a construction crew >>building a skyscraper next door to him chatting and relaxing with you. :) >> >>James >> >>>Thats my Point! >>>Best regards. >>>Terry >----------- >Hardly James, > He took these games Very seriously because he knew that the games were >going to be distributed to the members of our club and he doesnt like to lose to >anyone or anything! You know thats the criteria for a good player! > He was Pennsylvania State Champion the past 3 years in a row and there >were some higher ratings than his that he needed to Beat!!! >-------- >Terry -------- James, you don`t get my drift! Your comment about if Sokolov had played a different move then he probaly would have beaten Fritz! I can`t agree with you more on this statement but I`am talking about a different upgraded program (Hiarcs7.32) disagreeing with Hiarcs6 moves at certain critical points of the game! Example= Asking Kasporov`s opinion of Sokolov`s game on the critical move at move 11.Bc5 and we would all respect Kasporov`s opinion of a different move instead of 11.Bc5 because he is a stronger player.A different move at a critical point can change the outcome. That is what i mean by comparing Hiarcs6 to Hiarcs7.32 with the disagreement of certain key moves in those 2 games.I was making those key move comparisons because there are people on this forum comparing Hiarcs6 loses to a low rated master to the other top programs, saying that this is why all chess programs are still not High Rated Masters! I hope i`am getting my point across, this is just what i meant. -------- Best regards. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.