Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 03:16:55 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 05:55:46, blass uri wrote: > >On June 27, 1999 at 04:29:27, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On June 27, 1999 at 04:16:39, blass uri wrote: ><snipped> >>Hi Uri >> >>From what I gather, most of the games played between Fritz and Hiarcs have been >>played on one computer. Now from most games I have played with one machine a >>program is always disadvantaged. >> >>And with such large hash tables being used, the time to clear them would take >>time. >Hi Michael > >The time to clear big hash tables is not more than few seconds and it is not >significant at tournament time control. >Hiarcs has an advantage by the fact it can save time by not clearing the hash >tables but I do not think that it is a big advantage. > >I do not think that thesre should be a big difference between one computer and >two computers unless there is a bug in one of these systems. > >Uri ----- Hi Uri, What about the "pondering" idea? Does Hiarcs7.32 have enough of an advantage over its competition because it has stored information about its past move and so it don`t need to start over in its analysis on its next move like Fritz needs to do! It looks like no one on this forum can even guess how much of an advantage this might give to Hiarcs on single engine matches! Any opinions on this? ------ Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.