Author: blass uri
Date: 04:04:53 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 06:16:55, Terry Ripple wrote: >On June 27, 1999 at 05:55:46, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On June 27, 1999 at 04:29:27, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>> >>>On June 27, 1999 at 04:16:39, blass uri wrote: >> >>>Hi Uri >>> >>>From what I gather, most of the games played between Fritz and Hiarcs have been >>>played on one computer. Now from most games I have played with one machine a >>>program is always disadvantaged. >>> >>>And with such large hash tables being used, the time to clear them would take >>>time. >>Hi Michael >> >>The time to clear big hash tables is not more than few seconds and it is not >>significant at tournament time control. >>Hiarcs has an advantage by the fact it can save time by not clearing the hash >>tables but I do not think that it is a big advantage. >> >>I do not think that thesre should be a big difference between one computer and >>two computers unless there is a bug in one of these systems. >> >>Uri >----- >Hi Uri, > What about the "pondering" idea? Does Hiarcs7.32 have enough of an advantage >over its competition because it has stored information about its past move and >so it don`t need to start over in its analysis on its next move like Fritz needs >to do! It looks like no one on this forum can even guess how much of an >advantage this might give to Hiarcs on single engine matches! > Any opinions on this? I think that it is only a small advantage (I guess that p200 vs p90 that is in the ssdf games is clearly a bigger advantage and in the rating it give less than 100 elo difference. I guess that this gives hiarcs7.32 40 elo advantage(it can explain results like 5.5:4.5 for Hiarcs instead of 5:5 but not more than it) Uri Uri >------ >Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.