Author: Paul Richards
Date: 10:55:53 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 01:42:40, Tania Devora wrote: > > >Hi guys, I have finsihed my first twenty games between the super strong >Hiarcs7.32 and Fritz5.32 under tournaments controls, ( 2 hours and a half for 40 >moves, 1 hour for 20 moves, and all the moves for 30 minutes) . > >Fritz5.32 disapointed me totally, look the games, they all have good openings, >and more than once Fritz lost in winning positions. Look carefuly at the games. > >Please look carefuly the game number 20, is one of the most beautiful game than >i ever seen. Remember me the great JOSE RAUL CAPABLANCA. > >The results dont lie, Hiarcs7.32 is superior. My machine is k6-2 333 mhz with >128 ram, 44 mb for each one. 150 minutes for 40 moves. Tania, when are you going to consider that perhaps your results DO lie? This constant praise of Hiarcs is getting beyond ridiculous. Both the SSDF and recent WCCC disagree with your glorious assessment of Hiarcs vs. Fritz. It is HIGHLY LIKELY therefore that your tournaments done on the same machine ARE COMPLETELY WORTHLESS for making any serious determination. A serious comparison cannot be done running two programs on the same machine at the same time. Please check the WCCC results and SSDF list again and come back to a sense of reality. The legitimate, reasonable evidence suggests the programs are very close in strength, probably too close to call.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.