Author: Mark Young
Date: 10:58:21 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 05:55:46, blass uri wrote: > >On June 27, 1999 at 04:29:27, Micheal Cummings wrote: > >> >>On June 27, 1999 at 04:16:39, blass uri wrote: ><snipped> >>Hi Uri >> >>From what I gather, most of the games played between Fritz and Hiarcs have been >>played on one computer. Now from most games I have played with one machine a >>program is always disadvantaged. >> >>And with such large hash tables being used, the time to clear them would take >>time. >Hi Michael > >The time to clear big hash tables is not more than few seconds and it is not >significant at tournament time control. >Hiarcs has an advantage by the fact it can save time by not clearing the hash >tables but I do not think that it is a big advantage. I will give fritz 5 all the hash it wants 256mb. I know it will not help Fritz 5 or Fritz 5.32 over using 128mb. I will use it because perception is everything, and it they think this will make Fritz 5 and Fritz 5.32 into superman so be it. There is no big advantage in clearing or not clearing the hash tables, if people think this alone can account for Hiarcs7.32 winning some of the matches, they are full of it, the winning percentage is too big. I am left with the only conclusion, Hiarcs7.32 is good. > >I do not think that thesre should be a big difference between one computer and >two computers unless there is a bug in one of these systems. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.