Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 11:56:41 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 13:58:21, Mark Young wrote: >On June 27, 1999 at 05:55:46, blass uri wrote: > >> >>On June 27, 1999 at 04:29:27, Micheal Cummings wrote: >> >>> >>>On June 27, 1999 at 04:16:39, blass uri wrote: >><snipped> >>>Hi Uri >>> >>>From what I gather, most of the games played between Fritz and Hiarcs have been >>>played on one computer. Now from most games I have played with one machine a >>>program is always disadvantaged. >>> >>>And with such large hash tables being used, the time to clear them would take >>>time. >>Hi Michael >> >>The time to clear big hash tables is not more than few seconds and it is not >>significant at tournament time control. >>Hiarcs has an advantage by the fact it can save time by not clearing the hash >>tables but I do not think that it is a big advantage. > >I will give fritz 5 all the hash it wants 256mb. I know it will not help Fritz 5 >or Fritz 5.32 over using 128mb. I will use it because ______________________________________________________ Are you aware that Tania is giving Fritz only 44 mb at 40/150? And using only one computer? _______________________________________________________ perception is everything, >and it they think this will make Fritz 5 and Fritz 5.32 into superman so be it. > >There is no big advantage in clearing or not clearing the hash tables, if people >think this alone can account for Hiarcs7.32 winning some of the matches, they >are full of it, the winning percentage is too big. I am left with the only >conclusion, Hiarcs7.32 is good. > >> >>I do not think that thesre should be a big difference between one computer and >>two computers unless there is a bug in one of these systems. >> >>Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.