Author: Brett Clark
Date: 15:16:35 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 14:00:33, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >Does anyone have factual information regarding the reason for both the short and >long test? > >Question #2: How does these tests relate to the playing of a game at 40/2? > >Question #3: How many of these tests, either short or long are we supposed to >run? > >Question #4: On what criteria do you base your answers to the above? > >Now, I ran a short test with 32 megs for hash tables and the score was 133 >HiarcsMark 39kN/S. When I ran the same test with 64 megs, the score was 131 >HiarcsMark 39 kN/S. >At 145 megs the score was lower in kN/S and HiarcsMark. > >When I ran the long test with 32 megs of HT, the score was 280 HiarcsMark with >35 kN/S. When I ran the same test with 64 megs for HT, the score was still 280 >HiarcsMark but 34kN/S. Please keep in mind that I only ran one test for each >set-up. Now, there is absolutely nothing in regards to how these tests relate to >actual play or how many tests should be run - with Fritz 5.32 I believe it's all >automatic. > >I thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide. > >Regards, >Mel, Presdent of the Hiarcs Confusion Club. New menbers are welcome. There is no >annual membership fee. The only requirement is to own Hiarcs 7.32 and the rest >should come naturally. Melvin, at 32 KN/S Hiarcs 7.32 would take about 3 minutes to fill up 12 MB of hash tables on your machine. I may be wrong, but I believe that if you give Hiarcs 7.32 huge hash tables (i.e. Fritz), it may not perform as well.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.