Author: Mark Young
Date: 16:46:43 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 19:23:02, eric guttenberg wrote: >I can have Brett's opinion,too, and the evidence is abundant. In the last >several weeks results of games between H7.32 and F5.32 on separate computers >have consistently shown the two programs to be close or have shown F5.32 >to be better at blitz games; at the same time engine v engine results >have been posted over and over showing H7.32 to be almost 200 elo points >better than F5.32 at various time controls, including blitz. This difference >cannot be explained, except that engine v engine is a different animal than >computer v computer. > >eric My results on one computer have not shown this. I see this type of stuff all the time when some people post results by it on one computer or two. How knowns how they test or if they are showing the real and accurate results. I can only say I have seen nothing to say that you can not get accurate results with the chessbase interface playing it on one computer. If the data was scewed in a big way I would see it and it would not match up with my two computer results or other reliable two computer results.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.