Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Bookup Backsolving???

Author: Jerry Creed

Date: 17:33:24 06/27/99


After re-reading Komputer Korners explanation of violations
of the opposite priority rule leading to eradication of =/ and /= Informant
signs and the non-capturing all of the numerics phenomenon when importing
EPD files, backsolving seemed even less usable than ever, unless I wanted to
not use it and do all evaluations manually.  However, this dilemma is
clearly neutralized when re-reading Mike Leahy's Backsolving de-mystified.
So, can backsolving be trusted
if left on to Always Solve, should favor unclear over equality be checked or
unchecked and would you allow backsolving to work on Informant symbols or
just plain numerical, as from Zarkov?

 http://www.icdchess.com/wccr/index.html to find Komputer Korners' report :
Bookup 1.5.2: A Continuing Review by Komputer Korner on Wed May 12 11:53:24
1999
http://www.bookup.com/ Home of Bookup

jcreed@snip.net









This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.