Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 19:45:22 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
Hello Mark, I don't know if you saw my original post so I'll put it here: When I ran the long test with 32 & 64 megs for hash tables, the HiarcsMark was 280 for both but the kN/S was 34 for 64 megs and 35 for 32 megs. Does this mean that 32 megs would be better? The other interesting thing is how the amount of megs relates to the hash table retention. Perhaps even though it would search a bit faster with 32 kN/S, it may be more prudent to use 64 megs? Mel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.