Author: Mark Young
Date: 20:07:23 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 22:45:22, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >Hello Mark, > >I don't know if you saw my original post so I'll put it here: > >When I ran the long test with 32 & 64 megs for hash tables, the HiarcsMark was >280 for both but the kN/S was 34 for 64 megs and 35 for 32 megs. Does this mean >that 32 megs would be better? The other interesting thing is how the amount of >megs relates to the hash table retention. Perhaps even though it would search a >bit faster with 32 kN/S, it may be more prudent to use 64 megs? > >Mel This is a normal in windows to get some change like this. This can happen if you run 64 megs twice or 32 megs twice. A 1 Kns speed difference with Hiarcs 7 hitting in the mid 30's Knps will equal about ..........0 elo in rating difference. For fun run the short test with 1 meg of hash....you will see its the best. :p I hit a Hiarcsmark of over 350.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.