Author: Paul Richards
Date: 20:07:25 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 15:38:29, blass uri wrote: >1)The wccc results support the conjecture that on equal hardware the newest >Hiarcs is better than the newest Fritz. I do not know what version of Fritz was used. Since it supported multiple CPUs it could be quite experimental. I do not think there is enough evidence to make any conclusion simply based on Fritz' hardware. And frankly the fact that multiple CPUs are supported is a strong feature that Hiarcs needs to get as well. >Hiarcs lost to Fritz and drew with Junior when Fritz won Junior but Hiarcs drew >against shredder and won Ferret when Fritz lost against them. All of which supports my conclusion, namely that with existing evidence the greatest likelihood is that the programs are all rather close in strength, and Tania's results, enthusiasm notwithstanding, show a flawed testing method.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.