Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 00:05:09 06/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 18:16:35, Brett Clark wrote: >On June 27, 1999 at 14:00:33, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >> >>Does anyone have factual information regarding the reason for both the short and >>long test? >> >>Question #2: How does these tests relate to the playing of a game at 40/2? >> >>Question #3: How many of these tests, either short or long are we supposed to >>run? >> >>Question #4: On what criteria do you base your answers to the above? >> >>Now, I ran a short test with 32 megs for hash tables and the score was 133 >>HiarcsMark 39kN/S. When I ran the same test with 64 megs, the score was 131 >>HiarcsMark 39 kN/S. >>At 145 megs the score was lower in kN/S and HiarcsMark. >> >>When I ran the long test with 32 megs of HT, the score was 280 HiarcsMark with >>35 kN/S. When I ran the same test with 64 megs for HT, the score was still 280 >>HiarcsMark but 34kN/S. Please keep in mind that I only ran one test for each >>set-up. Now, there is absolutely nothing in regards to how these tests relate to >>actual play or how many tests should be run - with Fritz 5.32 I believe it's all >>automatic. >> >>I thank you in advance for any assistance you can provide. >> >>Regards, >>Mel, Presdent of the Hiarcs Confusion Club. New menbers are welcome. There is no >>annual membership fee. The only requirement is to own Hiarcs 7.32 and the rest >>should come naturally. > >Melvin, at 32 KN/S Hiarcs 7.32 would take about 3 minutes to fill up 12 MB of >hash tables on your machine. I may be wrong, but I believe that if you give >Hiarcs 7.32 huge hash tables (i.e. Fritz), it may not perform as well. -------- Mel, the formula i gave you backs this theory up!!! Try to stay calm!!! ----- Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.