Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:30:24 06/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 1999 at 13:58:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >There was no room for error interpretating what Amir said. >Secondly he went to the free banquet, although it was for >everyone obvious how difficult the position was, because ferret >had big problems making progression already when Amir left. Exactly. only a NON computerchess guy could claim that the position was an easy win for ferret. Computerchess-guys would have been more careful saying this. >The fact that the position was better for ferret doesn't take away >the fact that he left and then instead of congratulating the winner, >accused Bruce from giving away the world title by means of a deal >to Stefan. !!! Awful.- >You should come to next world championship... ...and see for yourselve... >...i see thorsten likes to remind of previous world championship. >Well, that's not how i want to put it. People change, but some things >in computerchess seem to never change. I accept that people change. but also any person should be judged by his actions ! In fact i had to play against virtual chess because amir complained in paris and this action reminds me to the same paranoia in his actions than the paderborn actions. >Greetings, >Vincent But - to come back to your program vince (or is this now OFF-TOPIC here ?!?!:-)) what has happened to diep from your point of view vince ? Can you give me a report about diep in paderborn from your point of view as an operator ?! Would be interesting for me... or email me ...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.