Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 11:30:24 06/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 1999 at 13:58:20, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >There was no room for error interpretating what Amir said. >Secondly he went to the free banquet, although it was for >everyone obvious how difficult the position was, because ferret >had big problems making progression already when Amir left. Exactly. only a NON computerchess guy could claim that the position was an easy win for ferret. Computerchess-guys would have been more careful saying this. >The fact that the position was better for ferret doesn't take away >the fact that he left and then instead of congratulating the winner, >accused Bruce from giving away the world title by means of a deal >to Stefan. !!! Awful.- >You should come to next world championship... ...and see for yourselve... >...i see thorsten likes to remind of previous world championship. >Well, that's not how i want to put it. People change, but some things >in computerchess seem to never change. I accept that people change. but also any person should be judged by his actions ! In fact i had to play against virtual chess because amir complained in paris and this action reminds me to the same paranoia in his actions than the paderborn actions. >Greetings, >Vincent But - to come back to your program vince (or is this now OFF-TOPIC here ?!?!:-)) what has happened to diep from your point of view vince ? Can you give me a report about diep in paderborn from your point of view as an operator ?! Would be interesting for me... or email me ...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.