Author: Michel Chassey
Date: 14:02:50 06/28/99
Go up one level in this thread
This is not a comment on what you wrote, Mr. Czub. But when you read the club's charter : I agree to all the terms and conditions below. [ Sign me up for the Computer-Chess Club now! ] you did agree to this : >>>>>>>>>>>> Once a member ..... with the proviso that these new or response messages: Are, within reason, on the topic of computer chess Are not abusive in nature >>>>>>>> Do not contain personal and/or libelous attacks on others <<<<< Since when do you disagree with our club's charter ? Michel Chassey ;/ On June 28, 1999 at 16:44:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >You limit your own possibilities. > >Talking about whatever things is not only >good or bad. > >It is the CONTENT. >If you reduce anything into 1-0 or 0-1 than you >miss the main thing. > >It should be possible to discuss things without putting it into >1-0 / 0-1 / 1/2-1/2 stages. > >So the question is wrong. >Not good or bad is the content. > >I am always attacked and people say i would hate company X or person Y. >But that is NOT the reason i talk about it. >In computerchess too, i am interested in the game. no matter >if the result is 1-0 / 0-1 or 1/2-1/2. >It is the game itself that interests me. >and you cannot call a game good or bad. you must discuss it from the content. >therefore i think it should be allowed to talk about things. >It is not the person to be criticized, it is the action he has done in >a certain context. >and it should be legal and not forbidden to discuss things that have >happen in this context.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.