Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Casting Apsersions -- Good or Bad?

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 14:15:51 06/28/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 28, 1999 at 16:54:05, Dann Corbit wrote:

>But where is the content?  Even if the charges were fully true, where is the
>benefit for the readers of the message?  Perhaps I say this because there is no
>benefit for *me* personally to hear bad reports about other people.  I just want
>to learn what they can teach me.  If someone got angry and said silly things, I
>reall don't care about it.  Now I admit that others might.  In fact I am curious
>about others viewpoint on this very matter [Do they want to hear it or not?].
>
>I see that sort of reporting as the equivalent of the "National Enquiror" or the
>"Star" or 'Tabloid' type reporting.  It has no interest whatsoever to me, but I
>see millions of them selling in the supermarket checkout line.  Maybe I am the
>one who has it all backwards as far as the majority is concerned.  I'd rather
>read "Scientific American" or "Awake" magazine than "People" or any of what I
>call 'Yellow Journalism' publications.
>
>But what can I say.  My mother, who was college educated, subscribed to the
>Enquirer for a time. :-(
>
>To each his tastes?
I do put here mostly anelyzes from games wich are not only looked trough by
Computers but also by me if program a say e4 is a good move and an other program
says d4 is the good move doesnt mean that one of them is good it goes about the
intire line wich is important And things wich you can clearly see and no dubious
 anelyses given by computer program ok I use the programs to get the see treu in
the tactical lines but I normaly find the strategy myself
I also only give a move a  questionmark at the moment I have seen that other
posible lines also would point out that the move isn't good and that it is
clearly see why the move isn't good.
A question can be made here what do you think wich is intresting in a game  or
somebody if it or he/she doent come to the point of the threuth
I gues you can't learn anything about that if you just take everything for real
and as threuth.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.