Author: James T. Walker
Date: 09:19:17 06/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 1999 at 10:46:35, Sune Larsson wrote: >I have followed the discussion of various Hash-Tablesettings with great >interest. There seems to be an agreement(?) in the fact that Hiarcs 7.32 needs >about 1/10 of the Hash-Tables needed by Fritz 5.32. So let´s see! > >PII-400 MhZ 128 MB RAM > >HashTables: Fritz 5.32 60MB Hiarcs 7.32 6 MB > >Books: Fritz 5.32 - F5-book Hiarcs 7.32 - Hiarcs-book > >Time: 60 minutes for the whole game > > >RESULTS: Fritz 5.32-Hiarcs 7.32 13,5-6,5 > > >F - H 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 = 13,5-6,5 > > Comments ? > >Greetings >Sune Hello Sune, I have been getting similiar results all along. I have played 76 games at Game/15 between Hiarcs7.32 vs Fritz 5.32 so far. The results are in favor of Fritz by 46.5 to 29.5. They were played with auto232 with Fritz 5.32 on a Pentium 333 with 64 M hash tables and Hiarcs was on a K6-2-400. I don't remember the hash setting for Hiarcs but it was the minimum it would allow using auto232. I think the GUI is set up for Fritz and the required hash tables for auto232 play may be high for Hiarcs. I have also played 200 games at game/5 min with the score in favor of Fritz 106.5 to 93.5. I played 200 game/5min vs Junior 5.0 and Hiarcs 7.32. Junior 5.0 won 100.5 to 99.5. I have played 10 "Long" games with Fritz leading so far 8 to 2. So, in my auto232 testing, Hiarcs has not won a single time control. I am continuing the "Long" games now playing 40/2hrs & 20/1hr with no sudden death. The required hash settings for this time control is 44 Meg. Any of these games are available for examination to anyone who request them. Jim Walker
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.