Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What went wrong with P.Conners and Zugzwang in WCCC?????

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 10:52:41 06/29/99

Go up one level in this thread


On June 29, 1999 at 09:55:36, Harald Faber wrote:

>On June 29, 1999 at 09:49:39, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On June 29, 1999 at 01:28:28, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>
>>>These superfast programs only got 3 resp 3.5 points! Specially P.Conners was
>>>one of the favourites before WCCC. I hope someone can give explanations.
>>>
>>>regards Jouni
>>
>>
>>I think it was an issue of 'robustness'.
>>
>>I have said many times that the most fortunate thing that ever happened to me
>>was winning the 1983 world championship, because our parallel search was only
>>completed two weeks prior to the event.  And at round-one time, we had not
>>played a complete game, although we had done plenty of testing, and we did a
>>very simple parallel search for that reason.
>>
>>This was one of the reasons I expected both Ferret and Shredder to do well,
>>because _both_ play lots of games on ICC.  And the first step toward becoming
>>a world champion is to play a _lot_ of games and have a bug-free program.  The
>>"research" guys have always hurt themselves here (me included) because access
>>to the 'real hardware' is often quite limited.  Which means you do lots of
>>testing on 'baby hardware'.  But an additional ply or two changes things a
>>lot, and without testing, bad moves are not uncommon.
>>
>>When everyone figures out that ICC is 'there', this will change...  :)
>
>In Germany you have to pay $2/h for Internet access, so 24h/day for a month is
>some $$...

Talk to the government.  :)

Here I pay 20 dollars per month for a second phone line in my home.  And I can
keep it up 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, no extra charge...




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.