Author: blass uri
Date: 14:15:15 06/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 1999 at 17:32:52, Sarah Bird wrote: >On June 28, 1999 at 16:54:05, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>But where is the content? Even if the charges were fully true, where is the >>benefit for the readers of the message? Perhaps I say this because there is no >>benefit for *me* personally to hear bad reports about other people. I just want >>to learn what they can teach me. If someone got angry and said silly things, I >>reall don't care about it. Now I admit that others might. In fact I am curious >>about others viewpoint on this very matter [Do they want to hear it or not?]. >> >>I see that sort of reporting as the equivalent of the "National Enquiror" or the >>"Star" or 'Tabloid' type reporting. It has no interest whatsoever to me, but I >>see millions of them selling in the supermarket checkout line. Maybe I am the >>one who has it all backwards as far as the majority is concerned. I'd rather >>read "Scientific American" or "Awake" magazine than "People" or any of what I >>call 'Yellow Journalism' publications. >> >>But what can I say. My mother, who was college educated, subscribed to the >>Enquirer for a time. :-( >> >>To each his tastes? > >This is not unlike the charges made against Dr. Hyatt by Sam Sloan on rgcc over >a long period of time. Charges that he still persists with on his website. >Fortunately Dr. Hyatt spoke out against what was said by Sam Sloan. This in my >opinion is something we should wait for from Amir Ban, not judge and arbitrate, >since it is something most of us were not involved in, and only those there or >involved in the accusations can accurately comment. >Sarah. Amir Ban also spoke out against what was said by vincent but all the thread was deleted. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.