Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:42:14 06/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
Suggestions:
If you want to make a discussion about something you feel is improper, don't
start by a statement of guilt. Provide instead evidence. If you have no
evidence, then you have no business making a charge.
Your title is sensational. It will bias the reader one way or the other to
start with. Let's try a hypothetical example.
"Here is a suggested line which I sent to the Rebel Corporation and they did not
accept it:
1 d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 c6 5.Nbd2 g6
And yet, here I see it played in a game by the Rebel Program!:
[Event "Y2K World Championship"]
[Site "Sea of Tranquility"]
[Date "2000.11.11"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Rebel X.Y"]
[Black "Bobby Fischer"]
[Result "1-0"]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 c6 5. Nbd2 g6 1-0 {Fischer Resigns}
So you see, they may have borrowed my ideas!"
But Joe Chessheart replies:
"That's just D30 Queen's Gambit Declined, and specifically the Spielmann
variation. It's in all the literature, and is mostly out of favor now."
That way, potential problems are avoided.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.