Author: Sarah Bird
Date: 16:09:31 06/29/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 1999 at 17:42:14, Dann Corbit wrote:
>Suggestions:
>If you want to make a discussion about something you feel is improper, don't
>start by a statement of guilt. Provide instead evidence. If you have no
>evidence, then you have no business making a charge.
>
>Your title is sensational. It will bias the reader one way or the other to
>start with. Let's try a hypothetical example.
>
>"Here is a suggested line which I sent to the Rebel Corporation and they did not
>accept it:
>
>1 d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.e3 c6 5.Nbd2 g6
>
>And yet, here I see it played in a game by the Rebel Program!:
>[Event "Y2K World Championship"]
>[Site "Sea of Tranquility"]
>[Date "2000.11.11"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Rebel X.Y"]
>[Black "Bobby Fischer"]
>[Result "1-0"]
>
>1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nf3 Nf6 4. e3 c6 5. Nbd2 g6 1-0 {Fischer Resigns}
>
>So you see, they may have borrowed my ideas!"
>
>But Joe Chessheart replies:
>"That's just D30 Queen's Gambit Declined, and specifically the Spielmann
>variation. It's in all the literature, and is mostly out of favor now."
>
>That way, potential problems are avoided.
Good post !!! clear and precise.
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.