Author: CLiebert
Date: 00:03:19 06/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 1999 at 12:47:43, Sune Larsson wrote: >On June 29, 1999 at 12:19:17, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On June 29, 1999 at 10:46:35, Sune Larsson wrote: >> >>>I have followed the discussion of various Hash-Tablesettings with great >>>interest. There seems to be an agreement(?) in the fact that Hiarcs 7.32 needs >>>about 1/10 of the Hash-Tables needed by Fritz 5.32. So let´s see! >>> >>>PII-400 MhZ 128 MB RAM >>> >>>HashTables: Fritz 5.32 60MB Hiarcs 7.32 6 MB >>> >>>Books: Fritz 5.32 - F5-book Hiarcs 7.32 - Hiarcs-book >>> >>>Time: 60 minutes for the whole game >>> >>> >>>RESULTS: Fritz 5.32-Hiarcs 7.32 13,5-6,5 >>> >>> >>>F - H 1 1 ½ ½ ½ ½ 1 1 1 0 0 1 ½ 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 = 13,5-6,5 >>> >>> Comments ? I have played hundreds of games alsways using see or nunn-test for elaminating the book-factor. Different time controls. K6-300 and P2-400. According to my results hiarcs is definetly better than fritz, especially with longer time-controls (may be 15m and more per games). Christian 500 Games, Eng-Eng
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.