Author: Peter McKenzie
Date: 05:59:12 06/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
title says it all really On June 29, 1999 at 16:16:44, Marc van Hal wrote: >Jeroen Noomen simply did denie that 40 a 50 % came from me and that the >antigrandmaster options and the ecotee where ideas from me. >I did send the proof that many lines did came from me against Jeroen Noomen >where he called himself de Leeuw on the Dutch chessweb in 1997 to Ed Schroder >And also to a dutch dealer of software at least he did find that I was right. >That is de dealer not Ed Schroder. >Once I only did ask if they could only say that I did help but they simply denie >everything >And spending many many hours on my games and that they did get used wasn't such >a problem >Only the denials makes me angry because it isn't simply honest >I did send Jeroen Noomen some letters after Rebel just came out because there >where also bad lines in the book wich didn't come from the games I had played >And all my games I did have put trough every critical line wich is posible >This was not ment then as an atack but more as a disapointment >because I was in that time a big Rebel fan >Well you can find out that that is changed in the mean while >I did laugh when Rebel10.5 did loose against GM Rhode in the exactly same game >that I saw also in 1997 in the game Rebel8 versus Chesmaster5000 >not a single move was changed even the move Qd3 came on the board wich is not a >GM move but in 1997 computers wheren't that good in finding the way to make a >flight for the king to improve the atack.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.