Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 09:44:39 06/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
Let me put one thing clear (this is the last I am going to say about this): Marc van Hal bombed me with unreadable email some time ago. I don't know this guy at all, even a polite answer to stop sending such messages didn't have the proper effect. To point out a few things to Marc here: 1. Sending me 10 or 20 emails doesn't mean that you have made 40 or 50% of the book. I regard this as a grave insult, because I spent 10 years on the Rebel book, all by myself. 2. I have never heard of the name De Leeuw, neither of the dutch Chessweb. I don't know what you are talking about. 3. I have never received any letter from you, only unreadable email. 4. Any claim from you on the Rebel program is not true, I think it is just in your imagination. To the readers I only want to add that a few minutes ago I received a personal email from mr. Van Hal, in which he calls me an utter lier and 'that he knows where he can find me'. This says enough about it, doesn't it? Here I stop with this nonsense. Marc, stop with your personal revenge actions against me. This is a place for computerchess, ideas, results and other interesting subjects. Not this kind of stuff. Lets return to normal things and delete this thread. It just gives me a headache and it has absolutely no sense at all. All readers of CCC i'd like to wish a pleasant evening. Regards, Jeroen Noomen >Jeroen Noomen simply did denie that 40 a 50 % came from me and that the >antigrandmaster options and the ecotee where ideas from me. >I did send the proof that many lines did came from me against Jeroen Noomen >where he called himself de Leeuw on the Dutch chessweb in 1997 to Ed Schroder >And also to a dutch dealer of software at least he did find that I was right. >That is de dealer not Ed Schroder. >Once I only did ask if they could only say that I did help but they simply denie >everything >And spending many many hours on my games and that they did get used wasn't such >a problem >Only the denials makes me angry because it isn't simply honest >I did send Jeroen Noomen some letters after Rebel just came out because there >where also bad lines in the book wich didn't come from the games I had played >And all my games I did have put trough every critical line wich is posible >This was not ment then as an atack but more as a disapointment >because I was in that time a big Rebel fan >Well you can find out that that is changed in the mean while >I did laugh when Rebel10.5 did loose against GM Rhode in the exactly same game >that I saw also in 1997 in the game Rebel8 versus Chesmaster5000 >not a single move was changed even the move Qd3 came on the board wich is not a >GM move but in 1997 computers wheren't that good in finding the way to make a >flight for the king to improve the atack.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.