Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Count of positions and encoding

Author: KarinsDad

Date: 09:53:40 06/30/99

Go up one level in this thread

On June 30, 1999 at 09:25:34, Randall Shane wrote:

>Oops.
>
>I rechecked my calculations, and it came out to just under 2*166.  Gotta work on
>it some more.
>
>Sorry about that.

Not a problem. I thought that you must have either came up with a MAJOR paradigm
shift to get to 151 bits OR you forgot the promotions since 151 bits seems to be
the minimum number (at least in my spreadsheet) for all of the pawns still on
the board.

Too bad it wasn't the paradigm shift since that would have been cool.

KarinsDad :)

• Re: Count of positions and encoding Randall Shane 13:27:33 06/30/99
  • Re: Count of positions and encoding (take 2) Randall Shane 13:55:03 06/30/99
    • Re: Count of positions and encoding (take 2) KarinsDad 14:30:11 06/30/99

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.