Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 13:08:11 06/30/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 1999 at 13:32:18, Chuck wrote: >On June 30, 1999 at 12:33:37, Sune Larsson wrote: > >>On June 30, 1999 at 12:23:41, eric guttenberg wrote: >> >>>A couple of recent posts have suggested that H7.32's opening book contains >>>a high number of seriously defective lines which may have contributed to >>>its negative score versus F5.32 in Jim Walker's autoplay games reported here >>>recently. >>>Is there in fact a significant quality gap between the opening lines played >>>out of F5.32 and H7.32 in their original opening books? >>>I am just trying to make some sense out or the highly coflicting results >>>between these two programs. It is almost enough to make me go out and buy >>>a second computer system to run some tests myself, but then my wife would >>>probably be facing homocide charges... >>> >>>eric >> >>Oh, these problems can be solved by therapy or something! At least we know >>that Hiarcs MUST play with "tournamentbook" on! >> > >>Greetings! >>Sune > >IMO Fritz has the best opening book of all the programs (with the possible >exception of Junior and Nimzo, which I don't have). I have NEVER seen Fritz >come out of book in a bad position. Fritz probably scores alot of points in >the SSDF, especially against older programs, before it even begins calculating. ----------- Hi Hiarcs7.32 Owners! My post from last night in regards to 2 games and one was a Sicilian was about this very thing. My Hiarcs7.32 never gone into these bogus lines and actually showed a decent plus in the one opening and the other, equality! I think who ever is getting messed up opening lines from Hiarcs should try and Re-set the Opening tree! There were other opening lines in openings that were complained about and when i ran it through my Hiarcs7.32 it was fine. Best regards, Terry Ripple
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.