Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hiarcs7.32 - Nimzo99 4 games (40/2) 2 - 2 Nimzo99 is great !!!!

Author: blass uri

Date: 01:38:10 07/01/99

Go up one level in this thread



On July 01, 1999 at 04:26:03, Stefan Meyer-Kahlen wrote:

>On July 01, 1999 at 02:17:05, blass uri wrote:
>
>>
>>On June 30, 1999 at 23:46:33, Tania Devora wrote:
>>
>>
>>>How is it possible that a program with a so powerful machine, didnt win ??
>>
>>It is possible and it is not the first time that things like these happen.
>>In the previous wccc Deep thought lost against Fritz3 inspite of the hardware
>>advantage of Fritz3.
>>
>>>
>>>I admire Shredder and Hiarcs than run in a simple Pentium III 550 MHZ,
>>>Hiarcs732 won over Ferret, in a wonderful way, won to Chesstiger, won over
>>>MChesspro8, draw again the champion Shredder ! and draw with Junior, all these
>>>better oponents than Fritz oponents.
>>>
>>> I'd like only to see Hiarcs7.32 or Shredder running in a machine as Fritz or
>>>Junior machine in the WCCC,  Im sure that that they would be strongest ones.
>>
>>I agree that Junior machine was better but I am not sure that my Junior5.4 is
>>worse than Hiarcs on equal machines.
>>Junior can find good moves that Hiarcs cannot find(for example the sacrifice
>>against Nimzo that my Junior find also with my pentium200)
>>
>>Junior chose a bad opening line against Hiarcs in WCCC and could not hope for
>>more than a draw inspite of the hardware advantage.
>>
>>I agree that Junior failed against shredder but one game is no proof that Junior
>>is worse.
>>
>>My feelings is that shredder is the best one on equal hardware but I have no
>>proof for it and I hope to be wrong about it.
>
>Why? :-)))

because I am for Junior and I am involved in giving Amir Ban games and ideas.

Uri




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.