Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: a correspondence player in 1/2 world final is worse than computers

Author: José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba

Date: 11:14:07 07/01/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 1999 at 01:43:49, blass uri wrote:

>This position is from the game Albert levin-avi keter(1/2 final of world
>correspondence championship)
>2rq2k1/4r3/3b3p/3P1pp1/1pN5/1B1Q1P1b/1P5P/R2R3K w - - 0 1
>
>Avi keter won the first place in the competition.
>It is legal to use computers.
>
>I believe that Albert levin did not use a computer seriously because computer
>programs can avoid 38.Nxd6 and find 38.Rg1 if you give them a long time(many
>hours).
>
>albert levin played 38.Nxd6? and if Qxd6 then 39.Ra6?
>and this was a mistake
>Avi keter says that 38.Nxd6 is missing a win when 39.Ra6 is missing the draw.
>39.Re1,39.f4,39.Rg1 are better than 39.Ra6.
>
>albert levin lost after 39...Rce8 40.Rg1? Bg2+ 41.Rxg2 Re1+ 42.Rg1 Qc5 43.d6+
>Kg7 44.Rf1 Qf2
>
>What is the result of programs(how much time do they need to avoid 38.Nxd6 and
>to avoid 39.Ra6)
>
>Uri

	Perhaps you should add that Mr. Levin is worse than computers in this
particular position.
	Has the 3/4 final of the Israel correspondence championship began? Have you
already chosen which program are going to use?
José.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.