Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 12:37:15 07/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 1999 at 11:16:06, Terry Ripple wrote: >On July 01, 1999 at 09:13:38, Steve Lopez wrote: > >>On July 01, 1999 at 00:57:48, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >> >>>>> >>>>>Hiarcs: Black: 1.e4...c5 2.Nf3...e6 3.d4...cxd4 4.Nxd4...Nf6 >>>> >>>>I think you mean 4...Nc6 >>>_________________________________________________________ >>> >>>No, I don't mean 4...Nc6!!! >>> >>>You are confused >> >>***I'm*** confused??? Go back and look at the line you posted the last time >>around and then tell me who's confused!! LOL!! You omitted a couple of important >>moves the last time around, Mel! The post I quoted said 4.Nxd4 Nf6 >>5.Nxc6 -- since this last move is not possible in the line you gave, I had to >>assume that Black's 4th move was ...Nc6 instead. You had left out the fifth move >>for both White and Black. >> >>>so let me post it here afain. >>> >>>Hiarcs is playing Black and I am playing White. >>> >>>1e4...c5 2.Nf3...e6 3.d4...cxd4 4.Nxd4...Nf6 5.Nc3...Nc6 6.Nxc6...bxc6 >>>7.e5...Nd5 (this is where Hiarcs should have played Qc7!) >> >>All of this is in Hiarcs' book so far (now that you've given me the correct move >>order). ;-D >> >> >>>8.Ne4...f5 >>>9.Nd6+ >> >>This is not in Hiarcs' opening book; the only move at this point is 9.exf6. So >>anything that comes after this in the book (highlighted in red or not) must be >>something you accidentally added to the book. >> >> >>>...Bxd6 (and here Hiarcs played Bxd6 when the info window said Bxd6 no >>>which was highlighted in red. >>>________________________________________________________ >>>> >>>>>5.Nxc6...bxc6 >>>>>6.e5 >>>> >>>>This move (6.e5) is not in Hiarcs' opening book, so one of you guys must have >>>_________________________________________________________ >>> >>>Hiarcs is playing Black! I played e5!!! >> >>Calm down -- once again, the correct move order in the post I originally quoted >>would have been helpful. >> >>-- Steve Lopez >-------- >Thanks Steve, this was also the reason my Hiarcs would not agree as the past >post from Mel was not correct move order! >-------- >Best regards, >Terry >------- >Terry What are you talking about? I posted two examples of Hiarcs playing White and Black. I clearly indicated which color for each opening. The question about why Hiarcs played the Sicilian has not been answered - quite typical of avoiding the issue. So I will post the same move order as I originally posted I am quite sure: Hiarcs is playing BLACK, and I am playing White! 1.e4...c5 2.Nf3..e6 3.d4...cxd4 4.Nc3...Nc6 5.Nxc6...bxc6 6.e5...Nd5 7.Ne4...f5 (here Hiarcs should have played Qc7 I do believe) 8.Nd6+...Bxd6 (and here Hiarcs played Bxd6 even though the info window said Bxd6 no which was highlighted in red). I have NOT added anything to the tree. I always have the tournament book on. I copied the tree via "copy tree to disc". Now, what have you to say? I also originally posted a move order for Hiarcs playing White and the Bishop's opening which was as bad if not worse than this Sicilian I posted. Regards, Mel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.