Author: Steve Lopez
Date: 12:45:01 07/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 1999 at 15:12:53, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >Show me where I gave you the incorrect move order? Gladly, and I quote: Hiarcs: Black: 1.e4...c5 2.Nf3...e6 3.d4...cxd4 4.Nxd4...Nf6 5.Nxc6...bxc6 6.e5...Nd5 (he claims his Hiarcs would not play Nd5). 7.Ne4...f5 8.Nd6+...and here while the screen info said Bxd6 no, with no highlighted in red, Hiarcs played Bxd6. However, that wasn't the issue - it was that Nd5. In any event, after the 7 moves, I believe Hiarcs has put itself in a fairly bad position by not playing the proper book line of Qc7 instead of Nd5. I also have another opening example with Hiarcs as White playing an awful first 8 moves where Black gets connected passed pawns in the center. This is opening book I'm referring too. In the quoted line above, 5.Nxc6 is clearly impossible. >Steve, > >What are you talking about? Hiarcs is playing Black. I have told you that >before. I played Nd6+. Are you reading what I write??? Yes, I am. The trouble is that it changes every time you write it. >Steve, > >You show me where I incorrectly posted the move order? See above. >Now, answer why Hiarcs played f5 allowing Nd6+ and forcing Bxd6 even though the >info screen said no to Bxd6 in red? Let's get the *proper* move order settled, *then* I'll check the opening book's contents. >Also, I have not added anything to the tree or leaves or Moon or Sun. Hiarcs >should have played Qc7, not f5. Can we be sure of this? After all, it seems to be a different move order each time you post. Who's to say *what* you've unwittingly done with the opening book. -- Steve Lopez (Charter member of the Melvin Schwartz Confusion Club)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.