Author: Steve Lopez
Date: 12:53:47 07/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 1999 at 15:37:15, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: >What are you talking about? The fact that you have a *very* dificult time posting variations that contain legal moves. >1.e4...c5 2.Nf3..e6 3.d4...cxd4 4.Nc3...Nc6 5.Nxc6...bxc6 6.e5...Nd5 >7.Ne4...f5 (here Hiarcs should have played Qc7 I do believe) 8.Nd6+...Bxd6 (and >here Hiarcs played Bxd6 even though the info window said Bxd6 no which was >highlighted in red). The first time this was posted, you skipped the move 4 pair. > >I have NOT added anything to the tree. I always have the tournament book on. I >copied the tree via "copy tree to disc". Now, what have you to say? How can we be sure? Your previous posts contain illegal moves, yet you insist that you've posted properly -- so how do we know *what* you've done to the opening book? >I also originally posted a move order for Hiarcs playing White and the Bishop's >opening which was as bad if not worse than this Sicilian I posted. Yes, it *was* as bad -- that line had an illegal move as well (f6 was listed as a move for White, but was impossible in that position). -- Steve Lopez
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.