Author: Melvin S. Schwartz
Date: 19:53:19 07/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 1999 at 15:53:47, Steve Lopez wrote: >On July 01, 1999 at 15:37:15, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: > >>What are you talking about? > >The fact that you have a *very* dificult time posting variations that contain >legal moves. > >>1.e4...c5 2.Nf3..e6 3.d4...cxd4 4.Nc3...Nc6 5.Nxc6...bxc6 6.e5...Nd5 >>7.Ne4...f5 (here Hiarcs should have played Qc7 I do believe) 8.Nd6+...Bxd6 (and >>here Hiarcs played Bxd6 even though the info window said Bxd6 no which was >>highlighted in red). > >The first time this was posted, you skipped the move 4 pair. > >> >>I have NOT added anything to the tree. I always have the tournament book on. I >>copied the tree via "copy tree to disc". Now, what have you to say? > >How can we be sure? Your previous posts contain illegal moves, yet you insist >that you've posted properly -- so how do we know *what* you've done to the >opening book? > > >>I also originally posted a move order for Hiarcs playing White and the Bishop's >>opening which was as bad if not worse than this Sicilian I posted. > >Yes, it *was* as bad -- that line had an illegal move as well (f6 was listed as >a move for White, but was impossible in that position). > >-- Steve Lopez ********************** The move order for the Bishop's opening is: 1.e4...e5 2.Bc4...Nf6 3.Nf3...Nxe4 4.Nc3...Nxc3 5.dxc3...f6 (yes f6). 6.Nh4...g6 7.f4...c6 8.f5...d5 9.fxg6 Okay, Steve, any comments? Mel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.