Author: Ted Sutton
Date: 20:49:48 07/01/99
Go up one level in this thread
Robin, Thanks for a fascinating post with regard to positions in the 11th USCCC where you believe your opponents relied on a computer for a faulty evaluation. This would be a very interesting and relevant test case for us,if you would care to share several of these positions with us (naturally without names). We are dealing here with very strong correspondence play, so can see what of errors of positional judgement computers make. (I was unaware that computer use is legal in the USCCC, but it is logical, since the USCCC is an ICCF sponsored event, and computers are legal under ICCF). In view of the fact that computer use was legal in these games, then your opponents, assuming they were consulting with computers, were acting ethically and legally (though perhaps unwisely), and there is no reason not to disclose these positions.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.