Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is this a poisoned pawn?

Author: Robin Smith

Date: 00:48:04 07/02/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 1999 at 01:01:16, Peter Kappler wrote:

>On June 30, 1999 at 18:03:14, Chuck wrote:
>
>>rn3rk1/pp2ppbp/6p1/8/3PP1b1/5N2/q2BBPPP/1R1Q1RK1 w - - 0 1
>>
>>I had Hiarcs 7.32 search the above position for several hours to a depth of 11
>>ply, and it wants to play Rxb7 scoring this +0.69. However, in looking at Fritz'
>>opening book, the move is not mentioned, only Bg5, Be3, and d5.
>>
>>This position arises from the Grunfeld Exchange, D85 as follows:
>>
>>1. d4 Nf6  2. c4 g6  3. Nc3 d5  4. cxd5 Nxd5  5. e4 Nxc3  6. bxc3 Bg7
>>7. Nf3 c5  8. Rb1 O-O  9. Be2 cxd4  10. cxd4 Qa5+  11. Bd2 Qxa2  12. O-O Bg4
>>
>>I searched the 2 million games opening database and found six occurrences with
>>no names that I recognized. In the six games, White drew 3 and lost 3 (1.5-4.5),
>>so that indicates the pawn should be left alone.
>>
>>But this brings up my point? Is Hiarcs heading for trouble? Is the pawn
>>poisoned, but in such a deep line that computers can't see it in reasonable
>>time? And will all computers make this mistake, if it is one?
>>
>>I'm interested in what other computers and other people have to say about this
>>position. How about it?
>>
>>Chuck
>
>
>In my opinion, White cannot afford to give up his d-pawn, even if he wins the b
>& e pawns in the process.  A simple variation is Rxb7 Bxf3 Bxf3 Bxd4 Rxe7 Nc6
>where White has won back his gambit pawn, but Black's minor pieces are more
>active and the passed a-pawn is very dangerous.
>
>I think White must preserve his "big center" in this position.
>
>--Peter

In the line above, 15.e5 threatening both Bh6 and the discovered attack on a8
looks better for white than 15.Rxe7




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.