Author: Pete Galati
Date: 20:29:32 07/02/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 1999 at 21:43:11, Fernando Villegas wrote: >I am sure almos all guys here share with me the following experience: you does >not get enough profit and enjoyment from the top-notch programs you already have >and not even know exactly how many things they can do for you because you are >thinking too much in those you still does not have or even does not exist yet. >Yesterday I realized how much time I have not loaded and played Rebel 10 because >of that, so I played two games in a row at 40/6o in my fastest computer, an >Armada 266, 98 Mb Ram. Rebel played with Anti-GM -anti patzer would fit better >fro me-, combination on, EOC in smart mode, tournament book, learning on and in >each game kicked my ass at around the 30ยบ move phase, where I was between 0,5 >and 1,12 points behind. The fact is that I have forgotten how good Rebel is, how >many things can do for me, etc. And the reason is the time I have lost playing >new freeware programs, testing, pitting one program against the other, etc. >I am sureif we could get a lot more fun if our best games -lost or won- could be >seen here ana analized publically for one or more Fide or IM that I know are >part of this club. It could be a way to improve our game AND to see the progress >of chess computer ahainst human at decent time, not hust a game in 30 minutes or >so. The my question is: are you, FM or IM players here, interested in looking at >the most interesting game of the month played by someone here and doing an >analysis of it and are you, members of this site, interested in delivering what >you consider your best game -lost or won, who cares- for that exercize? If this >kind of thing could be done, we could get not only a lot of fun, but some chess >education and we would produce another source for rating chess programs in the >decisive aspect of game played against the human race. >What do you think? >Fernando I like the idea, I might not participate though, but I'm not such a tuff oponent so I don't think my input would be missed much. The only problem I can really see is that you are very likely to get a flurry of computer annotations, and that you can probably do on your own. But I do like the idea. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.