Author: Sune Larsson
Date: 15:05:05 07/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 1999 at 17:09:39, Sarah Bird wrote: > >Hiarcs: White: >1. e4.....e5 >2.Bc4.....Nf6 >3.Nf3.....Nxe4 >4.Nc3.....Nxc3 >5.dxc3....f6 >6.Nh4.....g6 >7.f4......c6 >8.f5......d5 >9.f6... Look at this position and clearly Black is better. > >I believe you later posted that 9. Should be fxg as f6 is illegal. > >Now lets proceed. >9. fxg....dxc assumed >10. Qh5 > >This is the position you claim so bad for white ??? >Again I don't see it. Please post more details. >Thanks. >Sarah. I found 3 games with the position after 10.Qh5. 1) Vatter-Treppner Bad Aibling 1982 1-0 (49) 2) Goebel-Koskivirta IV EU ch 1990 0-1 (32) 3) Engstrom(2241)-Moberg(2320)SW 1992 0-1 (26) It happened: 10.-Kd7 11.g7 Bxg7 12.Qg4+ and in the first game: 12.-Kc7 13.Qxg7+ Nd7 14.0-0 Qf8 15.Bh6 Qxg7 16.Bxg7 Re8 17.Bxf6 Nxf6 18.Rxf6... In the other two games black played 12.-Kd6 13.Qxg7 Qf8 and now in game 2: 14.Qxf8+ Rxf8 15.Bh6 Rg8 16.0-0 Ke7 17.b3 Na6 18.Rae1 Nc7... In game 3 followed: 14.Qg3 /instead of 14.QxQ/ 14.-Be6 15.Nf3 Nd7 16.Be3 Kc7 17.Qf2 Rg8 18.a4 a6 19.a5 Re8 20.Ra4 Bd5 21.Kd1 c5... Gambling for all or nothing as soon as the game starts... Sune
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.