Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Calling Steve Lopez, Terry Cummings, & Other Hiarcs Owners

Author: Sarah Bird

Date: 17:00:45 07/03/99

Go up one level in this thread


On July 03, 1999 at 15:48:35, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:

>snip<

>I will explain to you how that was done. First, I play 40/2, since I cannot >play the whole game at one sitting, I save the game. After I save the game, the
>positon remains on the board. Now, I replay the moves with the tree and can see
>the the weights assigned to Hiarcs moves - that's where I saw Qc7 at 80% and >f5, which you don't seem to mind, at about 18%. Now, that in itself says >something -don't you think? So you think my pawn at d6 which is hemming in >Hiarcs White Bishop somewhat is not effectively placed and is a weakness. >Well, we shall see.
>At the present time I don't see a problem defending that pawn and I like what
>it's doing. I take it you don't see a problem with the pawn at d7. Okay, we
>shall see. If this position were given to a Grandmaster, I wonder what his or
>her comments would be about this and the Bishop's opening I posted - have you
>looked at that one?
>
>Mel
>***********************************

True, I think 8.....f5 is fine.
I do think the d6 pawn is a weakness, I am not to sure that longterm it can be
held after 13......c5.
I also don't see the c8 bishop as being a weakness since after 13....c5
it will be very nicely placed at either a6 or b7.
I do not at any point see anything like a 0.5 advantage for white.
I have looked at the bishop's opening see seperate posting where I ask for
additional information.
Sarah.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.