Author: Pete Galati
Date: 18:48:16 07/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 1999 at 20:21:47, Fernando Villegas wrote: >After reading messages produced by my proposal to send our games to a higher >authority for he -or them- to see them I have no other way that to say you are >right. It was a silly proposal arsing from my inveterate habitude to forget how >inmense human vanity is. Yes, all people here is willing to recognize "In >general" that they are beaten by his programs, but to show specific examples of >our miserable condition as chess players is an altoguether different thing. I >can imagine judgments of my own games: "This idiot does not a shit about >opennings"; "Fernando missed a tactical opportunity even a moron could see"; >"how a guy that does not know endings could be moderator or even member of this >site". Etc. Forget it all. >Fernando I don't think I would worry about your Chess playing at all. I am beaten by programs that I consider to be very week all the time. OTB I might be beaten by 8 out of 10 members here easily. The only glaring flaw that I could see in your idea is that because of the computer nature of this forum, the first thing that most of us would do is analyze your game with a program, so everyone would be responding with remarks like "well Crafty says" or "well Fritz (or hiarcs) says" So yes, it did sound like a good way to learn, but maybe it wouldn't work so good at CCC. Pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.