Author: Sarah Bird
Date: 15:20:26 07/04/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 1999 at 17:17:20, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote: <lots of snipping> >Yes, you have. When you said I didn't copy the tree correctly or added to the >tree, that was insulting for you didn't ask, you merely assumed. To this day, >Sarah still quotes that as being in another thread and thinks I actually did >what you thought. That is like spreading false rumors about someone! >Sarah still believes I didn't have the opening book set-up >correctly. She still quotes from the post where you "put words in my mouth" >about the opening book thing. And others probably still think that as well. If >you posted an open apology to all stating your mistake, well, that would have >been different. However, as it stands, anyone not reading the one reply where >you admit the mistake, would still believe what you originally stated. Mel, I have read every post throughout both threads. Including the one from James Walker who pointed out that while 9. Nd6+ wasn't in Hiarcs book the reply Bxd6 was. And that after 10 exd while Hiarcs book would say 10....Qb6 it would see itself as out of book. I also read Steve's post apologizing for the confusion. I also had experienced the same confusion while trying to play over the moves you had posted. It is true, I posted a couple of days ago about 8....f5 however that was of my own doing. I also immediately posted another stating that book learning had influenced my tree to a point where that was the likely cause of not playing 8....f5. However to my best re-collection my only post on the tree issue was in reply to a post about how to reset the tree weights. This will be my last note on this thread, best wishes. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.