Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Calling Steve Lopez, Terry Cummings, & Other Hiarcs Owners

Author: Melvin S. Schwartz

Date: 18:02:59 07/04/99

Go up one level in this thread



On July 04, 1999 at 18:20:26, Sarah Bird wrote:

>On July 04, 1999 at 17:17:20, Melvin S. Schwartz wrote:
>
><lots of snipping>
>
>>Yes, you have. When you said I didn't copy the tree correctly or added to the
>>tree, that was insulting for you didn't ask, you merely assumed. To this day,
>>Sarah still quotes that as being in another thread and thinks I actually did
>>what you thought. That is like spreading false rumors about someone!
>
>>Sarah still believes I didn't have the opening book set-up
>>correctly. She still quotes from the post where you "put words in my mouth"
>>about the opening book thing. And others probably still think that as well. If
>>you posted an open apology to all stating your mistake, well, that would have
>>been different. However, as it stands, anyone not reading the one reply where
>>you admit the mistake, would still believe what you originally stated.
>
>Mel,
>   I have read every post throughout both threads. Including the one from James
>Walker who pointed out that while 9. Nd6+ wasn't in Hiarcs book the reply Bxd6
>was. And that after 10 exd while Hiarcs book would say 10....Qb6 it would see
>itself as out of book. I also read Steve's post apologizing for the confusion.
>I also had experienced the same confusion while trying to play over the moves
>you had posted.
********************************************
I would say if you have any difficulty replaying moves that are posted by anyone
- the intelligent thing to do would be to ask that person if the move order is
incorrect as posted. I certainly wouldn't waste time on illegal moves - that
does not sound like a very good idea. Ask and you shall receive.

Mel
*****************************************************

>
>It is true, I posted a couple of days ago about 8....f5 however that was of my
>own doing. I also immediately posted another stating that book learning had
>influenced my tree to a point where that was the likely cause of not playing
>8....f5. However to my best re-collection my only post on the tree issue was in
>reply to a post about how to reset the tree weights.
>
>This will be my last note on this thread, best wishes.
>Sarah.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.