Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 13:30:07 07/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 1999 at 11:41:03, Harald Faber wrote: >On July 05, 1999 at 21:24:58, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>And most of the time Schreder3 loses >>Maybe something went wrong with the install. >>Is Schreder a positional or a tactical program ?(Though I had the feeling it was >>positional) >>Though I have the matches from Schreder3,I didn,t watch them yet. >>But one thing from these games was strange the way it handeled the endgame and >>the evaluation from the position(wich i strange for a positional >>program(comparing to Hiarcs and Rebel) >>Does anyone have a lot of Schreder games,( if posebile longertime control games) >>So I can compare it with the version on my comp? >>In forward thanks >>Marc van Hal > >Some other tester also had trouble and bad results of Shredder. The reason was >wrong hash size. Can you explain what you mean with wrong? Too small, too big or a wrong relationship between the hash table size and the evaluation table size? Ernst-J.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.